What do I see before paying?
Before purchasing the full audit, StatementIQ provides a preliminary analysis showing whether enough verified statement data was identified to generate a meaningful review, whether the file requires additional manual review, and a summary of identified potential savings opportunities based on the uploaded statement. The complete evidence-based report, including detailed fee analysis, benchmark comparisons, processor insights, and actionable recommendations, is only unlocked after checkout or when an available audit credit is applied.
Do you guarantee savings?
No. StatementIQ identifies credible savings opportunities, pricing concerns, and processor negotiation points based on the verified evidence available within your merchant statements. However, actual savings depend on factors such as your processor agreement, pricing structure, transaction mix, business profile, account history, and whether pricing or operational changes are ultimately approved or implemented. The purpose of the audit is to provide merchants with a clearer, evidence-based understanding of their processing costs and stronger leverage for informed pricing discussions and decision-making.
How does the peer comparison work?
StatementIQ compares key pricing and processing characteristics from your statements, including effective rate, processor markup, fee burden, pass-through cost share, transaction volume, ticket size, and transaction count, against the most relevant peer and industry reference ranges available. Comparisons are only generated when sufficient verified statement evidence exists to support a responsible and meaningful benchmark. This helps ensure the analysis remains credible, evidence-based, and grounded in comparable merchant profiles rather than broad or misleading averages.
Why do some findings say evidence is directional?
Merchant processing statements are often incomplete, inconsistent, or limited in the level of pricing detail they provide. In some cases, the statement may contain signals that strongly suggest potential savings opportunities, pricing issues, or operational inefficiencies, but not enough verified evidence to classify the finding as fully confirmed. When that happens, StatementIQ labels the insight as directional, investigative, or worthy of follow-up rather than presenting it as guaranteed savings. This approach helps keep the audit transparent, responsible, and evidence-based while still surfacing areas that may deserve closer review or processor discussion.